|
|
Pop
Culture, Polemics and Provocation: A Semiotic Analysis of Michael Moore (c)
Jessica Densmore,
2005 It
is a hegemonic cultural myth that western media is guided by a left-wing bias.
It is not “bleeding heart liberals” but rather multinational corporations
who control the production and distribution of media. In a world where the daily
news is too often translated through conservative propaganda vehicles like CNN,
and in which films must be approved by “big
six” media giants to reach an audience, it
is difficult for voices of dissent to establish a mainstream
following (http://www.pbs.org/). Over the past decade, writer and filmmaker Michael
Moore emerged as an icon of resistance whose work single-handedly demonstrates
how generic and/or conservative mainstream media representation has become. Figure
1, Michael Moore Image, www.wikipedia.org
An
initial semiotic analysis of this photo of Michael Moore reveals a big,
middle-aged, white man with light brown hair and glasses, dressed in a black and
white suit, holding a statue of a golden man in his right hand, and sticking two
fingers up on his left hand. A secondary semiotic analysis communicates that
this is indeed a photo Michael Moore: writer, film maker and
activist, dressed in a tuxedo, holding an 'Oscar' Academy Award statue for Best Documentary
Feature (Bowling for Columbine), and forming a peace sign. An even deeper
level of semiotic
analysis indicates that In
his book Nineteen Eighty-Four, George Orwell writes, "[t]he two aims
of the Party are to conquer the whole surface of the earth and to extinguish
once and for all the possibility of independent thought" (210).
Popular culture is often a vehicle for those in power ("the Party") to
perpetrate oppression, pacify the masses, and discourage critical thinking. When
six major companies with significant private interests both own and distribute
representation, it is rare for critical voices that fail to propagate those
interests to access a mainstream audience. Michael Moore, however, has managed
to bypass conservative cultural gatekeepers and to navigate the American
pop culture landscape. It
is important to note that Michael Moore has continually struggled against the censorship
of his work. In his book Dude Where's My Country ...after
9/11, my former publisher Regan Books (a division of HarperCollins which is a
division of News Corp which owns Fox News which is all owned by Rupert Murdoch),
was trying its hardest to make sure my career as an author
would come to an early end....The publisher then held the books hostage for five
long months-not simply out of good taste and respect (which I might Notwithstanding
the numerous attempts to censor A
political tumult, Michael Moore occupies a unique space in American culture and politics.
When Michael Moore accepted his Academy Award for the Best Documentary of the year
in 2002 for his film Bowling for Columbine, he stated in his acceptance
speech "[w]e live in the time when we have fictitious election results that
elect a fictitious president. We live in a time where we have a man sending us
to war for fictitious reasons" (Bowling For Columbine DVD Special
Features). This statement came in the immediate aftermath of Moore
is a paradox. In fact, Moore's paradoxical position has only contributed to his
status as an icon by generating public interest and controversy. On one hand,
Moore is white, male,
heterosexual, and affluent—the epitome of the self-actualized American dream folklore. On
the other hand, Moore presents as the "average American" from working
class Flint, Michigan
who speaks for the "common man" against the hypocrisy of American
policies (www.wikipedia.org).
Yes, Michael Moore is a man of privilege; however, he uses his privilege
responsibly by advocating for the disenfranchised and encouraging Americans to
question their foreign and domestic policies. Moore has become a
multimillionaire by critiquing the system
that created him, and has lined the proverbial wealthy pockets of those who
begrudgingly distributed
his material. Of course, it is because of Moore's very ability to generate vast
revenue that he has continued to find distributors for his films, and publishers
for his books. According to John Friske, Professor of Communication Arts at the
University of Wisconsin, "…the relationship between the commercial
interests of mass culture and popular interests is always antagonistic and
unstable" (331). While a mass audience has appropriated Michael Moore for
their own cultural
purposes, Michael Moore has also become a commodity which creates profit for the
very system that he critiques. The name Michael Moore has become a marketable
brand, guaranteed to sell books, films and other related merchandise. Michael
Moore is arguably one of the most stringently polarized pop culture idols of
recent years. On the left of the great American political divide between
Republican and Democrat, Moore has become a catalyst for activism and
change. Moore has imprinted mainstream media with an unabashedly liberal voice;
a voice that has, despite the myth of a left-wing media bias, been conspicuously
absent from mainstream media. To his fans, Moore is the ultimate
"patriot" and an advocate of democracy, exercising his free speech to
question authority. However, for many people on the political right, the name
Michael Moore is synonymous with 'liberal bias".
From this lens, Moore has been labeled as "unpatriotic" for his
critique of Bush and American
policy (Clarke, intro). In
an ironic criticism from the right, who are the political-cultural gatekeepers
of America, Moore has also been characterized as a "liar" who spins
"facts" to meet his political agenda. The
controversy over Michael Moore has fuelled his journey to iconic status. In the
wake of Moore's anticipated and acclaimed documentary Fahrenheit 9/11, Michael
Moore became an active
and visible figurehead of the Anti-Bush movement. Moore gained significant
exposure and recognition as he demonstrated how film, which is too often used to
perpetrate cultural norms, could be used as a vehicle of political critique.
Whether you love him, or hate him, it is difficult to consider the landscape of
American politics during the George W. Bush years without evoking the name of
Michael Moore. Michael Moore provided an alternative analysis and an alternative
vision of September eleventh (9/11) by exposing some of the deceit that was at
the heart of mainstream media reports on 9/11, he exposed another side of the
story to a mass-scale
audience. As a pop cultural icon Moore represents provocation: a
loud voice of resistance that demands attention. Moore has succeeded in making documentaries
"cool" by using humour to expose the system for its flaws. I
was first exposed to Michael Moore when I saw his film Roger and Me at a
repertory movie theatre in Toronto in the late nineties. I was a high school
student at the time and watching Moore's documentary empowered my desire to
create social change. A writer, who
would love to participate in the film making process, I was pleasantly caught
off guard by the clever, funny yet scathing film that so actively worked to
expose the system,
and advocate for the disenfranchised. I was amazed at the ability of Moore's documentary
to promote dialogue. Indeed, post-movie my friend and I went to Fran's Diner and
spoke about the film for hours over Chocolate milkshakes. Having viewed the
world through left-wing lenses as long as I can remember, I loyally followed
Moore's subsequent work as his career
escalated, and he became enshrined as a cultural icon. For the most part, I
consider Moore a
professional inspiration who reminds me of the potential to manipulate the
system from the inside, and evokes the possibility of utilizing media to promote
liberal values. Michael Moore's work resonates with me because it stands in
sharp contrast to the generic, oppressive images that often populate the
mainstream media. While not beyond criticism, engaging with Michael Moore's work
enables me to feel connected and inspires my need to be an agent of social change
who questions authority. Michael
Moore is an unlikely pop culture icon who continues to dominate the American political-cultural
landscape. A polemicist and journalist, Michael Moore has become a recognizable,
marketable and profitable brand whose work is certain to generate both acclaim,
and controversy. Michael Moore the icon is synonymous with liberalism, anti-Bush
sentiment, and provocation. I am looking forward to Michael Moore's upcoming
project, a documentary that exposes the corruption in the American
pharmaceutical and health care industry entitled Sicko, which will in all
likelihood further augment his status as a pop culture icon of resistance. Works
Cited Clarke,
Jason and David Hardy, Michael Moore is A Big Stupid White Man. New York:
HarperCollins, 2004. Fiske,
John. "Popular Culture." Critical Terms for Literary Study 2nd
ed. Eds. Frank Moore,
Michael. Bowling for Columbine. Dir. Michael Moore, Atlantis Alliance,
2002. —.
Dude Where is my Country? New York: Warner Book Inc., 2003. —.
Fahrenheit 9/11. Dir. Michael Moore. Lions Gate Entertainment, 2004. —.
Stupid White Men and other Sorry Excuses for a Nation. New York: HarperCollins,
2001. Orwell,
George. Nineteen Eighty Four. Toronto: Penguin Books, 1990. PBS
Online, "Media
Giants." Internet. March 2005. Available Wikipedia
Online Encyclopedia, "Wikipedia:
Michael Moore." Internet. March 2005. Available
http://en.wikipedia.orgAviki/Michael_Moore
|